Re: PostScript to Encapsulated PostScript?

Article View: comp.lang.postscript

Article #2340

Back to comp.lang.postscript Previous Next

#2340

From: C.E. Thompson
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 1990 13:46

9 lines
840 bytes

In article <3151@husc6.harvard.edu> bochner@flare.harvard.EDU (Harry Bochner) writes:
>  ... the programs that want to incorporate it are looking for a BoundingBox
>comment, an optional but highly desirable feature of the EPS standard. 

Actually, the BoundingBox structure comment is compulsory in an EPS file. 

Chris Thompson
JANET:    cet1@uk.ac.cam.phx
Internet: cet1%phx.cam.ac.uk@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1926@gannet.cl.cam.ac.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!ukc!cam-cl!cet1

References: <810@ssc.UUCP> <3151@husc6.harvard.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!ukc!cam-cl!cet1
From: cet1@cl.cam.ac.uk (C.E. Thompson)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: PostScript to Encapsulated PostScript?
Message-ID: <1926@gannet.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: 8 Jun 90 13:46:34 GMT
References: <810@ssc.UUCP> <3151@husc6.harvard.edu>
Sender: news@cl.cam.ac.uk
Reply-To: cet1@cl.cam.ac.uk (C.E. Thompson)
Organization: U of Cambridge Comp Lab, UK
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message