Re: Why is Mac PostScript a problem

Article View: comp.lang.postscript

Article #2541

Back to comp.lang.postscript Previous Next

#2541

From: Amanda Walker
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 1990 14:39

14 lines
1082 bytes

In article <2514@sequent.cs.qmw.ac.uk>, liam@cs.qmw.ac.uk (William Roberts)
writes:
> Apple may simply be trying to make it hard to include Mac postscript
> in other documents,

I suspect that they simply don't care if it's hard or not.  After all,
capturing the PostScript file in the first place isn't even a "real"
feature.  This attitude may be annoying to many of us, but Apple can
sometimes be awfully narrow-minded (and often it's not the engineers'
fault :)).

--
Amanda Walker <amanda@intercon.com>
InterCon Systems Corporation

Technical Details

Message-ID: <26A32311.19F4@intercon.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!intercon!news

References: <9674@hubcap.clemson.edu> <2514@sequent.cs.qmw.ac.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!intercon!news
From: amanda@mermaid.intercon.com (Amanda Walker)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: Why is Mac PostScript a problem
Message-ID: <26A32311.19F4@intercon.com>
Date: 17 Jul 90 14:39:12 GMT
References: <9674@hubcap.clemson.edu> <2514@sequent.cs.qmw.ac.uk>
Sender: usenet@intercon.com (USENET The Magnificent)
Reply-To: amanda@mermaid.intercon.com (Amanda Walker)
Organization: InterCon Systems Corporation, Herndon, VA
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message