Article View: comp.lang.postscript
Article #2642Re: Woody vs. PostScript again (was: Re: How to super-impose images ?)
From: Martin Fox
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 1990 20:41
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 1990 20:41
13 lines
1099 bytes
1099 bytes
> MOre to the point, I think that the contents of the imaging area > should be generally available to be operated on. There's no reason I can see > why things like finding the current bounding box or cutting and pasting the > image area shouldn't just work... Assuming that there IS an imaging area. Let's see; on a 1200-dpi typesetter, for a letter size page, that would only be, what, about 176K per square inch, which would work out to, what, about 16 Megabytes? Of course, you'd want to quadruple that for 2400-dpi. And then there's always larger page sizes... Maybe there *is* a reason why Postscript hides its imaging area? Martin Fox
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<16600005@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!hpcc01!hpdmd48!mfoxReferences:
<31377@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!hpcc01!hpdmd48!mfox From: mfox@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com (Martin Fox) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: Woody vs. PostScript again (was: Re: How to super-impose images ?) Message-ID: <16600005@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com> Date: 26 Jul 90 20:41:16 GMT References: <31377@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> Organization: Hewlett Packard - Boise, ID Lines: 13