Re: Straining PostScript or just stupid?

Article View: comp.lang.postscript

Article #280

Back to comp.lang.postscript Previous Next

#280

From: Scott Anguish
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 03:46

20 lines
1009 bytes

Anthony A. Datri writes
> 
> Here's an example of what I think you're talking about -- it prints the
> words "scratch tapes" filled with text.  It takes 10-15 minutes to process
> on a QMS PS810.
> -- 
> 	[ps in other message]
> ======================================================================8--<

	I ran this on my NeXT and it took a grand total of 3744 ms to image to  
the screen.

	I can remember this kind of stuff taking 30-45 minutes on the first  
apple laserwriters.

	Scott

-- 
- Scott Anguish -
sanguish@digifix.com (NextMail)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Jul21.034612.3178@digifix!uunet.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!digifix!sanguish

References: <1992Jul21.020615.22832@news.eng.convex.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!digifix!sanguish
From: sanguish@digifix.com (Scott Anguish)
Subject: Re: Straining PostScript or just stupid?
Message-ID: <1992Jul21.034612.3178@digifix!uunet.ca>
Sender: sanguish@digifix!uunet.ca
Reply-To: sanguish@digifix.com
Organization: Digital Fix Development
References: <1992Jul21.020615.22832@news.eng.convex.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 03:46:12 GMT
Lines: 21

Reply to Parent Message