Article View: comp.lang.postscript
Article #3010Re: Obscure LaserWriter features
From: Woody Baker Eagle Signal
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 1990 01:50
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 1990 01:50
23 lines
1422 bytes
1422 bytes
In article <1899@mountn.dec.com>, minow@mountn.dec.com (Martin Minow) writes: > In article <1990Aug31.082117.6829@grian.cps.altadena.ca.us> > alex@grian.cps.altadena.ca.us (Alex Pournelle) writes: > > One good reason why font caches ought not to reside on the Mac hard Who said anything about Mac's. This perception that Mac's and Postscript go together does not really hold water. There are plenty of other platforms that use the SCSI bus > disk is that the Mac OS wasn't setup to handle multiple SCSI bus You certainly should be able to get around this with the appropriate low level hardware programming. > false economy. If nothing else, the Laserwriter's font accesses will It would not be a matter of economy, but rather one of speed. Being able to write to the disk at the full SCSI speed would ridiculously speed printing up, as you can use the disk as a *VERY* large print buffer... Cheers Woody
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1546@chinacat.Unicom.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!usc!cs.utexas.edu!chinacat!woodyReferences:
<428@macuni.mqcc.mq.oz> <1510@chinacat.Unicom.COM> <1899@mountn.dec.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!usc!cs.utexas.edu!chinacat!woody From: woody@chinacat.Unicom.COM (Woody Baker @ Eagle Signal) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: Obscure LaserWriter features Summary: who said anything about macs? Message-ID: <1546@chinacat.Unicom.COM> Date: 5 Sep 90 01:50:22 GMT References: <428@macuni.mqcc.mq.oz> <1510@chinacat.Unicom.COM> <1899@mountn.dec.com> Organization: a guest of Unicom Systems Development, Austin Lines: 23