Article View: comp.lang.postscript
Article #4007Re: Postscript to draw the USA posted to alt.sources
From: Vidiot
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 1992 07:50
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 1992 07:50
40 lines
2562 bytes
2562 bytes
In article <1992Nov6.162433.4244@bcars6a8.bnr.ca> clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca (Chris Lewis) writes:
<In article <4365@vidiot.UUCP> brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot) writes:
<
<>How about my suggestion to have a PostScript sources group? Oh, I can hear
<>the screams and moans now...not another newsgroup. But what could be more
<>natural than to have a PostScript sources group within the PostScript
<>newsgroups.
<
<It's not that bad idea - that's what comp.sources.* is for. However,
<the current convention is that there's no language differentiation in
<the groups, only O/S (or "refereed review", versus "review", versus "packaging
<standards only"). However, since PostScript is, in one sense, a different environment
<altogether from UNIX, a comp.sources.postscript might fly - especially if
<moderated. I suspect, tho, the arguments would be about PostScript being a
<graphics format (and hence should be under alt.binaries), or there being
<insufficient demand (for PS programs versus, say, pornos) that it would
<be a long slog.
<
<I dunno. What do other people think? If we decide that one's appropriate
<and that it has a reasonable chance at flying, I'm amenible to running
<the vote.
I still believe that there should be some kind of available group for PostScript
sources, be it a comp.sources.postscript or a comp.lang.postscript.sources
group. It should not be an alt group, so that more readers can get it.
<>BTW. Did you ever receive my e-mail about enhancments to the psxlate man
<>page? I never heard back from you.
<
<Yes. But I'm going to implement something different to solve the problem.
<This isn't a documentation problem. I did send something to you. Musta
<gotten lost somehow.
Sorry Chris, never received it. Could you send it out again, to my work
address?
--
harvard\ spool.cs.wisc.edu!astroatc!vidiot!brown
Vidiot ucbvax!uwvax..........!astroatc!vidiot!brown
rutgers/ INTERNET:vidiot!brown%astroatc.UUCP@spool.cs.wisc.edu
brown@wi.extrel.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4402@vidiot.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!rutgers!uwvax!astroatc!vidiot!brownReferences:
<4343@vidiot.UUCP> <3925@ecicrl.ocunix.on.ca> <4365@vidiot.UUCP> <1992Nov6.162433.4244@bcars6a8.bnr.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!rutgers!uwvax!astroatc!vidiot!brown From: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: Postscript to draw the USA posted to alt.sources Message-ID: <4402@vidiot.UUCP> Date: 8 Nov 92 07:50:56 GMT References: <4343@vidiot.UUCP> <3925@ecicrl.ocunix.on.ca> <4365@vidiot.UUCP> <1992Nov6.162433.4244@bcars6a8.bnr.ca> Reply-To: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot) Organization: Vidiot's Hangout Lines: 40