Re: Graphic Conversion Utility for Encapsulated PostScript Files...

Article View: comp.lang.postscript

Article #4242

Back to comp.lang.postscript Previous Next

#4242

From: Richard Foulk
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 1990 17:08

11 lines
894 bytes

>As for GoScript, it's not that great.  UltraScript PC is much nicer,
>and GhostScript is better yet (it's free and very fast).  [...]

But Ghostscript has a long way to go yet before it will handle the average
postscript file, it blows up on all kinds of things.  And the font handling
is still pretty bad.



-- 
Richard Foulk		richard@pegasus.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990Dec15.170843.5623@pegasus.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!uhccux!bigtuna!pegasus!richard

References: <1990Dec8.215752.9450@cs.dal.ca> <1741@chinacat.Unicom.COM> <1990Dec9.075628.25308@unlv.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!uhccux!bigtuna!pegasus!richard
From: richard@pegasus.com (Richard Foulk)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: Graphic Conversion Utility for Encapsulated PostScript Files...
Keywords: postscript ! Augh !
Message-ID: <1990Dec15.170843.5623@pegasus.com>
Date: 15 Dec 90 17:08:43 GMT
References: <1990Dec8.215752.9450@cs.dal.ca> <1741@chinacat.Unicom.COM> <1990Dec9.075628.25308@unlv.edu>
Organization: Pegasus,  Honolulu
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message