Re: Ghostscript: The bad news

Article View: comp.lang.postscript

Article #4250

Back to comp.lang.postscript Previous Next

#4250

From: Terry Jones
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 1990 15:29

12 lines
879 bytes

Just to put my 2 cents worth in, I too would like to jump to Peter's
defence. 

GhostScript is ALREADY a fine product and a very useful one at that.
If it goes commercial in the future (as so many other products
have... Procomm, Stuffit, Red Ryder etc...) so be it. Until then
stop carping about someone that is doing a good job and put your
energy into commercial packages that cost megabucks and
have megabugs... (eg every x.0 release of WordPerfect!!)

Keep up the good work Peter.
tj

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990Dec17.152922.9340@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!tj

References: <1990Dec16.104300.12930@pegasus.com> <1990Dec17.034817.8171@spool.cs.wisc.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript,gnu.misc.discuss
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!tj
From: tj@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca (Terry Jones)
Subject: Re: Ghostscript: The bad news
Message-ID: <1990Dec17.152922.9340@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca>
Organization: UTCS Public Access
References: <1990Dec16.104300.12930@pegasus.com> <1990Dec17.034817.8171@spool.cs.wisc.edu>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 90 15:29:22 GMT

Reply to Parent Message