🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.postscript
Article #4840

Re: signatures in PostScript

#4840
From: Rodney Peck II
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 1991 03:49
17 lines
1347 bytes
>	And yet, faxed signatures seem to bear legal weight.  I've dealt
>with lots of vendors who would not ship goods on a verbal PO, but were happy
>to with a faxed one (a Purchase Order is technically a legally binding
>contract which obligates us to pay for the specified goods). 

    Please --- not to pick on this one person, but this has gotten way off
    from the topic of postscript and bear little useful information for
    comp.lang.postscript.  There are plenty of other places to talk about
    the ramifications of digitized signatures.  And they talk about them
    until they are blue in the face in those groups.

    There have been about twenty messages of this sort so far, and I think
    that we either get the point or don't care.

    Thank you
-- 
Rodney
Technical Details
Message-ID: <A{2-6N?@rpi.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!rodney
References: <431@heaven.woodside.ca.us> <Fm3VX2w163w@phoenix.com> <1991Feb26.022149.28846@phri.nyu.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!rodney
From: rodney@sun.ipl.rpi.edu (Rodney Peck II)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: signatures in PostScript
Keywords: PostScript  signatures   bitmaps   cleverness
Message-ID: <A{2-6N?@rpi.edu>
Date: 26 Feb 91 03:49:03 GMT
References: <431@heaven.woodside.ca.us> <Fm3VX2w163w@phoenix.com> <1991Feb26.022149.28846@phri.nyu.edu>
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY
Lines: 17
Nntp-Posting-Host: ipl.rpi.edu