Article View: comp.lang.postscript
Article #5041Re: PhoenixPage PostScript
From: Bob Bondi
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1991 21:48
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1991 21:48
8 lines
1009 bytes
1009 bytes
I have been testing various PS color printers (QMS,NEC and Seiko) and find in general they all work fine. I have found that the Seiko clone PS is actually better at printing complex objects that have a gradient fill, (blending of color from a start color to a finish color). I am not sure why the clone does a better job (in fact QMS & NEC both crap out) unless Seiko is using less than 300 DPI, or maybe they don't 'flatten' like they others. Whatever, I'd recommend that you create as complex a picture as possible and get the salesman to show you a printout!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<05BZCLP@dri.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!torsqnt!hybrid!scifi!bywater!uunet!drivax!bondiReferences:
<1991Mar14.094104@zeno.Berkeley.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!torsqnt!hybrid!scifi!bywater!uunet!drivax!bondi From: bondi@dri.com (Bob Bondi) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: PhoenixPage PostScript Summary: Seiko PS clone printers Keywords: Any Problems? Message-ID: <05BZCLP@dri.com> Date: 15 Mar 91 21:48:50 GMT References: <1991Mar14.094104@zeno.Berkeley.EDU> Sender: Bob Bondi Organization: Digital Research Inc Lines: 8