Article View: comp.lang.postscript
Article #5380Setscreen question
From: Christopher Tate
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1991 02:33
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1991 02:33
22 lines
1277 bytes
1277 bytes
Does binding the procedure argument to setscreen have any effect? I.e. is
85 35 {dup mul exch dup mul add 1.0 exch sub} bind setscreen
equivalent in function to
85 35 {dup mul exch dup mul add 1.0 exch sub} setscreen ?
Does binding the spot function give incorrect results? If not, it seems
like binding it should give an appreciable savings in speed, since it's
called often. Or, it could be that the setscreen operator binds it itself,
or some other part of the imaging system does. In that case, binding it
would have essentially no effect....
Which of the above is correct? :-)
-------
Christopher Tate |
Student-Type Person | "The whole place is coming alive!"
cxt105@psuvm.psu.edu |
{...}!psuvax1!psuvm.bitnet!cxt105 | "Yeah, and we're coming *dead*...."
cxt105@psuvm.bitnet |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<91106.223332CXT105@psuvm.psu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ysub!psuvm!cxt105Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ysub!psuvm!cxt105 From: CXT105@psuvm.psu.edu (Christopher Tate) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Setscreen question Message-ID: <91106.223332CXT105@psuvm.psu.edu> Date: 17 Apr 91 02:33:32 GMT Organization: Penn State University Lines: 22