Article View: comp.lang.postscript
Article #5577Re: Diatribe, revisited
From: Jamie Zawinski
Date: Sun, 05 May 1991 23:10
Date: Sun, 05 May 1991 23:10
8 lines
1050 bytes
1050 bytes
Tomas Rokicki posted some good ideas about test suites and PS preprocessors. But I'd just like to point out that Adobe doesn't really need to have anything to do with this. I mean, if someone were to write the code you mentioned and make it public domain, it would get distributed, and used. I think the problems are more rooted in ignorance than in lack of legislation. (That applies to a lot of things, doesn't it? :-)) -- Jamie
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<JWZ.91May5181049@thalidomide.lucid.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!stanford.edu!lucid.com!campeau!jwzReferences:
<1991May5.214431.27894@neon.Stanford.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!stanford.edu!lucid.com!campeau!jwz From: jwz@lucid.com (Jamie Zawinski) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: Diatribe, revisited Message-ID: <JWZ.91May5181049@thalidomide.lucid.com> Date: 5 May 91 23:10:49 GMT References: <1991May5.214431.27894@neon.Stanford.EDU> Sender: usenet@lucid.com Organization: Lucid, Inc., Menlo Park, CA Lines: 8 In-Reply-To: rokicki@neon.Stanford.EDU's message of Sun, 5 May 1991 21:44:31 GMT X-Windows: Flawed beyond belief.