Re: Who bakes the Best PostScript?

Article View: comp.lang.postscript

Article #5684

Back to comp.lang.postscript Previous Next

#5684

From: Berthold K.P. Horn
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 17:02

8 lines
876 bytes

Talking of which, why are there still losts of programs around that
understand DSC 2.0, but not DSC 3.0? Hasn't it been two or three years
since the revision was made?  I am thinking particularly of page imposition
software (can ANY read DSC 3.0?), PostScript previewers etc.

Berthold K.P. Horn
Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1e8k7uINNa8p@life.ai.mit.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!ai-lab!kauai!bkph

References: <1992Nov12.153918.12371@usiva.com> <BxnGrn.Lso@dcs.ed.ac.uk> <1e0bafINNfdp@transfer.stratus.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!ai-lab!kauai!bkph
From: bkph@kauai.ai.mit.edu (Berthold K.P. Horn)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: Who bakes the Best PostScript?
Date: 16 Nov 1992 17:02:54 GMT
Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <1e8k7uINNa8p@life.ai.mit.edu>
References: <1992Nov12.153918.12371@usiva.com> <BxnGrn.Lso@dcs.ed.ac.uk> <1e0bafINNfdp@transfer.stratus.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kauai.ai.mit.edu
In-reply-to: nick@sw.stratus.com's message of 13 Nov 92 13:41:35 GMT

Reply to Parent Message