Article View: comp.lang.postscript
Article #5748Re: Is there interest in comp.sources.postscript?
From: Henry McGilton
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 21:47
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 21:47
19 lines
1356 bytes
1356 bytes
In article <1992Nov18.141054.28598@panix.com> schuster@panix.com (Michael
Schuster) writes:
* I would LOVE to see somp. sources.postscript.
* In fact, that's what I originally thought/hoped THIS newsgroup would be,
* instead of a recurring cycle of "Do you have a filter to convert nnn to
* PostScript" and "Do you have a filter to convert PostScript to nnn".
As I already stated, I'm not convinced of the usfulness of a
comp.sources.postscript group because the volume of useful
source is too low to warrant such a group. I vote no.
My vision of comp.lang.postscript is a forum to discuss PostScript
issues and techniques. The issue with Level Two image that
Chris Lilley raised the other day is a good example of a good
use for the group.
I agree with Mike that there's too much irrelevant drivel on
converting the universe to PostScript and vice versa.
........ Henry
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov19.214703.10609@trilithon.mpk.ca.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!nntp1.radiomail.net!fernwood!trilithon!henryReferences:
<1992Nov18.141054.28598@panix.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!nntp1.radiomail.net!fernwood!trilithon!henry From: henry@trilithon.mpk.ca.us (Henry McGilton) Subject: Re: Is there interest in comp.sources.postscript? Message-ID: <1992Nov19.214703.10609@trilithon.mpk.ca.us> Sender: henry@trilithon.mpk.ca.us Organization: Trilithon Software References: <1992Nov18.141054.28598@panix.com> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 21:47:03 GMT Lines: 19