Article View: comp.lang.postscript
Article #5782Re: Worst PostScript: (Was Who bakes the Best PostScript?)
From: Michael Slade
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 22:52
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 22:52
16 lines
1204 bytes
1204 bytes
djs@jet.uk (David J Stevenson) writes: >In <92322.131958AUBXG@ASUACAD.BITNET> AUBXG@ASUACAD.BITNET (Ben Goren) writes: >>... >>As far as the worst PostScript goes, I'd say that Finale (a music >>notation program for the Macintosh) has to win the prize hands down. >>I'd even go so far as to say that it's the worst programming I've >>... >So you've never used Calligrapher then :-) > I don't know how they do it, but MicroSoft Project is right up there with the worst of them. When drawing a large grid, it seems to draw each grid element as a separate graphic... it takes forever. -- Michael Slade, Datavision Technologies
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov22.225207.23328@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!msladeReferences:
<1992Nov12.153918.12371@usiva.com> <92322.131958AUBXG@ASUACAD.BITNET> <1992Nov19.145828.12026@jet.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!mslade From: mslade@netcom.com (Michael Slade) Subject: Re: Worst PostScript: (Was Who bakes the Best PostScript?) Message-ID: <1992Nov22.225207.23328@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) References: <1992Nov12.153918.12371@usiva.com> <92322.131958AUBXG@ASUACAD.BITNET> <1992Nov19.145828.12026@jet.uk> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 22:52:07 GMT Lines: 16