🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <6803@m1.cs.man.ac.uk> lilleyc@cs.man.ac.uk (Chris Lilley) writes:
>In article <1992Nov14.235834.9723@dsd.es.com> rthomson@dsd.es.com
>(Rich Thomson) writes: 
>>This is one of the many reasons for moderating a sources group.  The
>>moderator would simply weed out any comments and not approve them.
>
>You mean, just discard them? Why? Are you trying to stop any of the
>discussion that would occur when sources were posted?
>
>Or are you suggesting that the moderator(s) should redirect discussion
>to the comp.lang.postscript?

It is real simple to put a Followup-To: header into the posted sources 
which redirects the discussion to the right place.  I add a 
   Followup-To: comp.sources.d
to posting which go to comp.sources.misc.  That way the discussion goes on 
where it should and I need to deal with much less mail... :-)   In the case 
of comp.sources.postscript the followups could be redirected to c.l.postscript.
Also, I politely inform people who have misdirected discussion posts to c.s.misc
so that they know they need to repost them to the right group.

			-Kent+
---
Kent Landfield                   INTERNET: kent@IMD.Sterling.COM
Sterling Software, IMD           UUCP:     uunet!sparky!kent
Phone:    (402) 291-8300         FAX:      (402) 291-4362
Please send comp.sources.misc-related mail to kent@uunet.uu.net.