cexec in Level 2?

Article View: comp.lang.postscript

Article #6626

Back to comp.lang.postscript Previous Next

#6626

From: Steve Beyer
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 13:05

6 lines
632 bytes

Is it correct that cexec is no longer supported in Level 2? (I don't mean
undocumented; I mean that using it results in an error.) If that is so,
does anyone know of any Level 2 substitutes for getting low-level code to
the interpreter? Is this why Adobe has (I am told) abandoned Lasertalk?
Inquiring minds want to know. --Steve

Technical Details

Message-ID: <C0L8CG.LuJ@well.sf.ca.us>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!well!sbeyer

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!well!sbeyer
From: sbeyer@well.sf.ca.us (Steve Beyer)
Subject: cexec in Level 2?
Message-ID: <C0L8CG.LuJ@well.sf.ca.us>
Sender: news@well.sf.ca.us
Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 13:05:04 GMT
Lines: 7