Re: When is PostScript not PostScript?

Article View: comp.lang.postscript

Article #6953

Back to comp.lang.postscript Previous Next

#6953

From: Crispin Goswell
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 1988 16:36

20 lines
1170 bytes

Chris Thompson wrote:

>Well, I don't want to carp, but I can't imagine a serious PostScript
>application that wouldn't use save and restore.

You might be surprised.
I'm sure plenty of people can find examples where these operators are used, but
many of the major text processing and diagram applications, make only trivial
use of the power of save and restore.
This is of course a generalisation... :-)

My interpreter has managed without for quite a while now.
I've had other comments about it, but very little said about save and restore.

Most interpreters are incomplete because the language is not trivial to implement.
Freely available interpreters (such as mine) are likely to be more incomplete than
those people charge money for (such as Adobe's), for obvious reasons.

- Crispin Goswell

Technical Details

Message-ID: <29854.8803071636@vd.rl.ac.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!think!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!vd.rl.ac.UK!caag

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!think!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!vd.rl.ac.UK!caag
From: caag@vd.rl.ac.UK (Crispin Goswell)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: When is PostScript not PostScript?
Message-ID: <29854.8803071636@vd.rl.ac.uk>
Date: 7 Mar 88 16:36:55 GMT
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 20