Re: Experiences in using PostHaste on M

Article View: comp.lang.postscript

Article #7104

Back to comp.lang.postscript Previous Next

#7104

From: rce229
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 1988 19:23

17 lines
1285 bytes

> Does anyone have any comments, good or bad, on using the software
> product PostHaste on Macintosh machines to develop PostScript
> applications?           Len Schwer       Schwer@KL.SRI.COM

I haven't heard much about PostHaste, but MacUser May 1988 gave its
highest rating to LaserTalk.  In the review it mentions PostHaste
as "the only other program out there for serius PostScript programming."
LaserTalk's major extra appears to be a Preview mode, which gets the
bitmap from the printer.  The price is $249 compared to PostHaste's
$60; it probably has other advantages (I hope!) not mentioned in ads
or this review.

If you buy either program, or hear anything about them, please send
me any useful information you find.

Rob Elliott

Technical Details

Message-ID: <136800003@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!att-ih!pacbell!ames!umd5!purdue!i.cc.purdue.edu!j.cc.purdue.edu!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!rce229

References: <2126914056@KL.SRI.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!att-ih!pacbell!ames!umd5!purdue!i.cc.purdue.edu!j.cc.purdue.edu!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!rce229
From: rce229@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: Experiences in using PostHaste on M
Message-ID: <136800003@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 27 Apr 88 19:23:00 GMT
References: <2126914056@KL.SRI.COM>
Lines: 17
Nf-ID: #R:KL.SRI.COM:2126914056:uxa.cso.uiuc.edu:136800003:000:743
Nf-From: uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!rce229    Apr 27 14:23:00 1988

Reply to Parent Message