Re: PostScript problems

Article View: comp.lang.postscript

Article #7276

Back to comp.lang.postscript Previous Next

#7276

From: Simon Peter Gatrall
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 1988 07:12

7 lines
676 bytes

>Whilst on this topic, I have always regarded the
>omission of a dotless j from the Adobe fonts a serious omission.

Permit me to ask what I hope is a stupid question.
Why on earth would you want a dotless j?

-Simon Gatrall          sg1q+@andrew.cmu.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <MWoR=Sy00XcOxQc0-p@andrew.cmu.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!gatech!udel!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!sg1q+

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!gatech!udel!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!sg1q+
From: sg1q+@andrew.cmu.edu (Simon Peter Gatrall)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: PostScript problems
Message-ID: <MWoR=Sy00XcOxQc0-p@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: 6 Jul 88 07:12:30 GMT
Organization: Carnegie Mellon
Lines: 7
In-Reply-To: <5@phys0.anu.oz>