Article View: comp.lang.postscript
Article #7715Re: Why is Display Postscript Fast when Printer Postscript is Slow?
From: Steve Tynor
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 1988 21:24
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 1988 21:24
20 lines
1391 bytes
1391 bytes
In article <1481@helios.ee.lbl.gov> forrest@ux1.lbl.gov (Jon Forrest) writes:
>I'd like to hear comments about how Display Postscript is fast
>enough to be used as a display system whereas Printer Postscript
>seems to be the bottleneck on many laser printers. Is my
>assumption about the cause of the bottleneck correct? What is
>missing from Display Postscript that makes it unsuitable to also
>be Printer Postscript? Does Display Postscript performance degrade
>when complicated images are displayed the way Printer Postscript
>does? What are the other differences that make the speed of
>Display Postscript so much better?
Could it have something to do with lower resolution (e.g. ~75 dot/inch vs.
~300)?
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
No problem is so formidable that you can't just walk away from it.
Steve Tynor
Georgia Tech Research Institute
tynor@gitpyr.gatech.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6953@pyr.gatech.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!bbn!gatech!gitpyr!tynorReferences:
<1481@helios.ee.lbl.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!bbn!gatech!gitpyr!tynor From: tynor@pyr.gatech.EDU (Steve Tynor) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: Why is Display Postscript Fast when Printer Postscript is Slow? Message-ID: <6953@pyr.gatech.EDU> Date: 15 Dec 88 21:24:37 GMT References: <1481@helios.ee.lbl.gov> Reply-To: tynor@pyr.UUCP (Steve Tynor) Organization: Georgia Tech Research Institute Lines: 19