Re: Compiled PostScript

Article View: comp.lang.postscript

Article #8684

Back to comp.lang.postscript Previous Next

#8684

From: Amanda Walker
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 1990 17:15

10 lines
827 bytes

In article <17529@rpp386.cactus.org>, woody@rpp386.cactus.org (Woodrow Baker)
writes:
> It may be a part of the description for all I know, as I don't have
> a manual dealing with the filestuff, but Don reports it as a bug.  At the
> least, it is an annoyance.

Does anyone else find this as amusing as I do ...?

Amanda
--

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1668@intercon.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!intercon!news

References:

<POLLACK.89Dec4133944@toto.cis.ohio-state.edu> <28@macuni.mqcc.mq.oz> <17524@rpp386.cactus.org> <17529@rpp386.cactus.org>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!intercon!news
From: amanda@mermaid.intercon.com (Amanda Walker)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: Compiled PostScript
Message-ID: <1668@intercon.com>
Date: 2 Jan 90 17:15:12 GMT
References: <POLLACK.89Dec4133944@toto.cis.ohio-state.edu> <28@macuni.mqcc.mq.oz> <17524@rpp386.cactus.org> <17529@rpp386.cactus.org>
Sender: news@intercon.com
Reply-To: amanda@mermaid.intercon.com (Amanda Walker)
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message