Article View: comp.lang.postscript
Article #8765FPU for PostScript
From: Dick Dunn
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 1990 04:42
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 1990 04:42
21 lines
1528 bytes
1528 bytes
woody@rpp386.cactus.org (Woodrow Baker) writes:
> baffico@adobe.COM (Tom Baffico) writes:
> >...As to the benefit of having a FPU, for most controllers the performance
> > increase is actually quite small.
>
> AS to the benifits of a FPU, I am certain that the speedup would matter.
I tend to agree with Tom, and while I haven't investigated it, I assume
that Adobe has. Intuitively, it seems reasonable; I'd think the down'n'
dirty work of the font rendering would be mostly fixed point. Probably a
lot of it is not numerical work at all. Still, as I suggest, I ASSume that
Adobe knows what they're doing.
Woody - please submit some evidence that an FPU would make some useful
speedup in a PostScript controller. I don't mean your conjecture; I mean
some real evidence, or solid reasoning. Since, once again, you're trying
to tell Adobe that they don't know their business, the burden of proof is
on you.
--
Dick Dunn rcd@ico.isc.com uucp: {ncar,nbires}!ico!rcd (303)449-2870
...Mr. Natural says, "Use the right tool for the job."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Jan9.044252.18617@ico.isc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!ico!rcdReferences:
<POLLACK.89Dec4133944@toto.cis.ohio-state.edu> <1666@intercon.com> <17582@rpp386.cactus.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!ico!rcd From: rcd@ico.isc.com (Dick Dunn) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: FPU for PostScript Summary: Please submit evidence Message-ID: <1990Jan9.044252.18617@ico.isc.com> Date: 9 Jan 90 04:42:52 GMT References: <POLLACK.89Dec4133944@toto.cis.ohio-state.edu> <1666@intercon.com> <17582@rpp386.cactus.org> Organization: Interactive Systems Corporation, Boulder, CO Lines: 21