🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.postscript
Article #907

Re: Are there any 'real' fonts available?

#907
From: jimi
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 1989 19:07
47 lines
2650 bytes
In article <761@ecrcvax.UUCP>, diomidis@ecrcvax.UUCP (D. Spinellis) writes:
> In article <HOLLAND.89Aug25144558@m2.csc.ti.com> holland@m2.csc.ti.com (Fred Hollander) writes:
> >Even if the font supports ligatures, are there any software packages
> >that will recognize that a ligature should be used?

> Ditroff supports ligatures:

> miranda6% echo affluent | ditroff | psdit | tail
> 				% Postscript output for the first page;
> 				% (Prologue ommited)
> %%Page: 1 1
> 10 s 10 xH 0 xS 1 f
> 576 96(af\257uent)N		% affluent
> %	 ----			(The fl ligature for Times-Roman)
> 1 p
> %%Trailer

ditroff has a ligature mode that can be turned on and off.
When ligature mode (set by an argument to the .li request) is on,
ditroff attempts to set ligatures. In the case of Adobe's fonts,
however, ditroff can only set the ligatures available in the font.

In the preceding example, "affluent" should not contain an "fl"
ligature. Rather, it should contain an "ffl" ligature.
I've wondered why Abobe's otherwise skilled typeface designers
consider the "ff," "ffi," and "ffl" ligatures unnecessary.

To see the difference, typeset the following words (with your
equivalent of ligature mode on, of course) on a PostScript
typesetter and a typesetter that provides a complete f-ligature
set, e.g., Compugraphic 8400: official, efficient, affiant,
effacing, affective, effective, iffy, affluent, effluvium,
effloresce, afflux. Times Roman and equivalents are excellent
test fonts.

The words set in the font with the complete f-ligature set look
much smoother. The f[f-ligature] words look like they have bumps
in them, bumps that distract the eyes and call unwelcome attention
to word's components.

This isn't to praise Compugraphic, in particular, though their fonts
are very good, but to pick on Adobe's type designers, whose incomplete
f-ligature sets detract from their otherwise fine fonts. I'm curious
about why they made this decision.
-- 
Jim Ingram	          uunet!h-three!jimi | jimi%h-three@uunet.uu.net
h-three Systems Corporation   P.O. Box 12557 RTP NC 27709   919 549 8334
Technical Details
Message-ID: <724@h-three.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mcnc!rti!h-three!jimi
References: <HOLLAND.89Aug25144558@m2.csc.ti.com> <761@ecrcvax.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mcnc!rti!h-three!jimi
From: jimi@h-three.UUCP (jimi)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript,comp.fonts
Subject: Re: Are there any 'real' fonts available?
Summary: what is a complete ligature set, and why don't Adobe's fonts have one?
Keywords: ligatures ditroff
Message-ID: <724@h-three.UUCP>
Date: 31 Aug 89 19:07:02 GMT
References: <HOLLAND.89Aug25144558@m2.csc.ti.com> <761@ecrcvax.UUCP>
Organization: h-three Systems, Research Triangle Park,  NC
Lines: 47