Re: best method of commenting out blocks of postscript?

Article View: comp.lang.postscript

Article #9206

Back to comp.lang.postscript Previous Next

#9206

From: Woodrow Baker
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 1990 13:44

10 lines
881 bytes

Remember that the NEC 890 throws the comments away at the
serial input routine.  That is, if you test a line for a
comment, you will never see it on the NEC 890.  On other printers
it will cause Cassidy and Green fonts to fail.  It might also
effect block commenting structures.
Cheers
Woody
r
printers it will.  This causes Century Software fonts to wokn

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1035@chinacat.Lonestar.ORG>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!chinacat!woody

References: <22649@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <18106@rpp386.cactus.org>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!chinacat!woody
From: woody@chinacat.Lonestar.ORG (Woodrow Baker)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: best method of commenting out blocks of postscript?
Summary: rember the NEC 890
Keywords: comment blocks
Message-ID: <1035@chinacat.Lonestar.ORG>
Date: 7 Mar 90 13:44:23 GMT
References: <22649@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <18106@rpp386.cactus.org>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Unicom Systems Development, Austin (yay!)
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message