Article View: comp.lang.postscript
Article #94Re: Postscript 2-way communication needed ?
From: Sam Hartman
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 1992 20:21
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 1992 20:21
59 lines
3711 bytes
3711 bytes
>>>>> On 31 Oct 92 02:59:05 GMT, xxronr@convx1.lerc.nasa.gov (Ron Rivett) said: In article <1992Oct31.025905.6047@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov> xxronr@convx1.lerc.nasa.gov (Ron Rivett) writes: Ron> Nntp-Posting-Host: convx1.lerc.nasa.gov Ron> Nearly all of the Postscript printing that I have been involved with, Ron> (either as a user or in setting up Postscript printers on Unix systems Ron> with Network Print Servers, such as an Emulex P3000 or the Milan Fastport), Ron> has been in a "one-way-mode" (i.e. sending a Postscript file to a black & Ron> white or color Postscript printer). Ron> I understand that many Postscript printers can send status information back Ron> to the host, but I would like to know how often this "two-way" flow of Ron> information is really needed. Is the ability to receive information back Ron> from a Postscript printer really needed in "day-to-day" usage with Ron> applications that generate Postscript, or is mainly used to debug Ron> Postscript programs or obtain status or other types of information from the Ron> printer ? Ron> I am asking this because several vendors of Postscript printers are Ron> insisting that we buy their TCP/IP network interface hardware, instead Ron> of using a Network Print Server, because this "two-way" flow of Ron> information in Postscript printing is critical. After 6 months of Ron> setting up a few pilot systems with Sun and SGI Unix systems, Network Ron> Print Servers, and Postscript printers such as a Tektronix Phaser IIIpxi Ron> or Apple LaserWriter, I have yet to see a need for this "two-way" flow of Ron> information at a user level. Can someone clarify this or point me towards Ron> any publications that can clarify this issue ? Ron> Ron> If this "two-way" flow of information is really needed, how is this Ron> integrated into a spooling system, such as a BSD lpr/lpd system, and a Ron> "production" environment where users are printing documents very often Ron> (i.e. Not a limited usage environment where a user could monopolize a printer Ron> for a given period of the day) ? Ron> Ron> Thank you Ron> ================================================================================ Ron> Ronald R. Rivett voice: (216) 433-8281 Ron> Sverdrup Technology Ron> NASA Lewis Research Center NASA LeRC FAX: (216) 433-8000 Ron> 21000 Brook Park Road E-mail: xxronr@convx1.lerc.nasa.gov Ron> Cleveland, Ohio 44135 Ron> Mail Stop 142-2 Ron> ================================================================================ Ron> I've found printer communication to be useful. On the RS/6000, if it's configured right (big if), the print system will `write' a message back to a user indicating that their job has failed, including the printer output. However, for UNIX, I haven't seen any program that needed the two-way communication. We considered mounting a printer on token-ring, but even then, we were going to drive it with a server, and just use the ring for speed. (38400 gets slow!)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<HARTMANS.92Nov1152104@npc.ece.utexas.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!emx.utexas.edu!hartmansReferences:
<1992Oct31.025905.6047@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!emx.utexas.edu!hartmans From: hartmans@npc.ece.utexas.edu (Sam Hartman) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: Postscript 2-way communication needed ? Message-ID: <HARTMANS.92Nov1152104@npc.ece.utexas.edu> Date: 1 Nov 92 20:21:04 GMT Article-I.D.: npc.HARTMANS.92Nov1152104 References: <1992Oct31.025905.6047@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov> Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp Organization: The University of Texas at Austin Lines: 59 In-reply-to: xxronr@convx1.lerc.nasa.gov's message of 31 Oct 92 02:59:05 GMT