Re: Postscript to HPLJII under UNIX?

Article View: comp.lang.postscript

Article #5094

Back to comp.lang.postscript Previous Next

#5094

From: Rich Berlin
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1991 21:06

8 lines
789 bytes

Someone here nicely pointed out that I mixed up bits and bytes.  The
correct performance numbers are more like

((1000KB) * (10bits/byte)) / (19.2Kbits/sec) == 520 sec = 8.6minutes

The 10 bits per byte assumes a parity bit and one stop bit.

-- Rich

Technical Details

Message-ID: <10145@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!exodus!birdland!rberlin

References: <91079.092124FZAAC02@cc1.kuleuven.ac.be> <10132@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!exodus!birdland!rberlin
From: rberlin@birdlandEng.Sun.COM (Rich Berlin)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: Postscript to HPLJII under UNIX?
Message-ID: <10145@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM>
Date: 20 Mar 91 21:06:13 GMT
References: <91079.092124FZAAC02@cc1.kuleuven.ac.be> <10132@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM>
Sender: news@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM
Reply-To: rberlin@Eng.Sun.COM
Organization: Sun Microsystems
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message