Article View: comp.lang.postscript
Article #1253Faster LaserWriters?
From: Eric Fielding
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1989 20:38
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1989 20:38
16 lines
1353 bytes
1353 bytes
We have a (still running fine) Apple LaserWriter (original model) connected to our VAXcluster. We are finding that it is simply too slow in rendering complicated or large PostScript files. For instance, one program generates files that are about 13 MB each that take about 4-5 hours to print on the LaserWriter. Would it help for us to buy a new LaserWriter II? Is the II/NT significantly faster at processing or is the 9600 baud connection the main bottle-neck. Last time I was paying attention (over a year ago) the laser printers that connect directly to an Ethernet were much more expensive (we probably could not find more than several thousand or so). Oh, and a related question. There is a Linotronic printer somewhere here on campus. Would it be capable of rendering large quantities of PostScript efficiently if we want a publication-quality version? ++Eric Fielding eric@geology.tn.cornell.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9144@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!rpi!batcomputer!ericShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!rpi!batcomputer!eric From: eric@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu (Eric Fielding) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Faster LaserWriters? Message-ID: <9144@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> Date: 25 Oct 89 20:38:48 GMT Reply-To: eric@geology.tn.cornell.edu Distribution: na Organization: Department of Geological Sciences, Cornell University Lines: 16