Re: PostScript Language

Article View: comp.lang.postscript

Article #9108

Back to comp.lang.postscript Previous Next

#9108

From: Ivan N. Bach
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1990 12:28

15 lines
1129 bytes

munck@chance.UUCP (Robert Munck) writes:

>Wow!  Suppose there were 10,000,000, and they each waste 20MB and 40 hours!
>Or even 1,000,000,000 and each wastes 2,000MB and 9,000 hours a year!
>That would be even huger.
Since you work for a defense contractor, you must be so used to wasting our
tax dollars that we could not possibly expect you to be interested in any cost 
saving measures.  The rest of us have to pay our bills ourselves.  I am almost
certain that you have never used a PostScript interpreter in the executive or
interactive mode, and have no idea what I am talking about.

Ivan N. Bach                      Tel (408) 986-9400, x508
QMS, Inc.                         Fax (408) 727-3725 
2650 San Tomas Expressway         arpa: ib@imagen.com 
Santa Clara, CA 95051             uucp: decwrl!imagen!ib

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9465@imagen.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!sun!imagen!daemon

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!sun!imagen!daemon
From: ib@apolling (Ivan N. Bach)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: PostScript Language
Message-ID: <9465@imagen.UUCP>
Date: 28 Feb 90 12:28:55 GMT
Sender: daemon@imagen.UUCP
Lines: 15