Thread View: comp.lang.postscript
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by jeff zeitlin
Sat, 12 Dec 1992 16:41
goscript
Author: jeff zeitlin
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 16:41
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 16:41
48 lines
2738 bytes
2738 bytes
NH::>Firstly, does anyone know if this product is any good? ::>Secondly, does anyone know if it will work on my LX-800? Firstly: I used to use this program (until I ran out of disk space; GoScript was the first thing that went - it's huge). I liked it, although occasionally it would break on PS files that were perfectly O.K. when dumped to a real PS printer. I reported the bugs; some of them got fixed, some didn't. (I no longer use it; I've got a TrueType system.) GoScript supplies its fonts in a proprietary format. It will take type 1 and 3 Adobe fonts, but because of the way it handles them (as opposed to the way it handles its proprietary format), you will not be able to include more than two or three Adobe fonts in a PS document. Very nasty restriction, as there aren't a lot of GoFonts (the proprietary format) beyond the "standard" 35 and the most common decoratives. GoScript is something of a resource hog; the driver simply converts the PS code into a bit map in memory (If you're lucky, and have XMS or EMS - 1 to 1.5 Meg per page, depending on printer resolution) or on disk (if you're not lucky - same requirement), and when it hits the showpage, it shovels the bit map out to your printer. Slooooooooow! Secondly: I believe that the LXs are compatible with either the LQs or the FXs (I forget which), so you should be able to use one of those drivers. There may also be a LX driver; they added a bunch of drivers when they released the 3.0 version (I started with 2.0 and upgraded to 3.0), and I simply don't recall whether the LX was one of the new drivers. Overall rating: 4.5 - 5.5 (1 to 10 scale, 10 best). Best feature: Wide range of printers supported. Worst feature: Unpredictability as to when you'll exceed its capacity. Drawbacks: slow, limited capability to handle 3rd party fonts, large resource requirements, erratic bugs. Worth it? Call it, based on your own needs. Once I got Win31 and TT, no. J/ jeff.zeitlin@execnet.com --- รพ QMPro 1.0 41-4533 รพ Printer paper is always strongest at the perforation. -- Executive Network Information System (914) 667-4567 International ILink Host
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads