Article View: comp.lang.prolog
Article #1249Re: PDC prolog gripe/question
From: F0O
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 1990 14:30
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 1990 14:30
20 lines
1387 bytes
1387 bytes
In article <145400@kean.ucs.mun.ca>, jgarland@kean.ucs.mun.ca says:
>Personally, I just think of global declarations as .h files (in the C
>sense) and put them in include files. But as that takes you back
>towards C...
Right, that's exactly what went through my mind too. Guess what PDC
prolog is probably written in ... :-)
Since I posted the original article, I have bit the bullet and tried
the example they gave on pgs. 78-79 of the reference manual. It's not as
bad as it sounds; although the solution is not to use any global domain or
databases. Unfortunately, you can't get around the include file for the
global predicates...
I would imagine that not using any global domains, if you would have
redundant declarations in different files, this would increase the size of
the symbol table?
I just hope PDC does improve the project facility, among other things
in their next release.
[Tim]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<90287.103007F0O@psuvm.psu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!f0oReferences:
<90285.232430F0O@psuvm.psu.edu> <145400@kean.ucs.mun.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!f0o From: F0O@psuvm.psu.edu Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog Subject: Re: PDC prolog gripe/question Message-ID: <90287.103007F0O@psuvm.psu.edu> Date: 14 Oct 90 14:30:07 GMT References: <90285.232430F0O@psuvm.psu.edu> <145400@kean.ucs.mun.ca> Organization: Penn State University Lines: 20