Article View: comp.lang.prolog
Article #1270Re: Standards question: behavior of arg/3
From: Inst.f.Prakt.Info 1802
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 1990 12:32
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 1990 12:32
12 lines
911 bytes
911 bytes
In article <3992@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> ok@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au (Richard A. O'Keefe) writes: [...discussion of design principles for BIPs...] > ?- arg(N, [a,b,c], X). >makes perfect sense and has two solutions > N = 1, X = a ; > N = 2, X = [b,c] . Which Prolog systems have arg/3 defined in this way? Ulrich Neumerkel ulrich@vip.at ulrich@vip.UUCP
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1920@tuvie>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!timbuk!cs.umn.edu!ub.d.umn.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!olivea!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!tuvie!brockReferences:
<9888@bunny.GTE.COM> <3992@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!timbuk!cs.umn.edu!ub.d.umn.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!olivea!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!tuvie!brock From: brock@tuvie (Inst.f.Prakt.Info 1802) Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog Subject: Re: Standards question: behavior of arg/3 Keywords: ANSI, standard Message-ID: <1920@tuvie> Date: 18 Oct 90 12:32:14 GMT References: <9888@bunny.GTE.COM> <3992@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> Reply-To: brock@tuvie.UUCP (Ulrich Neumerkel Inst.f.Prakt.Info 1802) Organization: Technical University of Vienna, EDP-Center Lines: 12