Article View: comp.lang.prolog
Article #1299Re: SICStus prolog vs. SBprolog?
From: Micha Meier
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 1990 21:32
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 1990 21:32
17 lines
1286 bytes
1286 bytes
In article <4010@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> ok@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au (Richard A. O'Keefe) writes: >If you can't afford a commercial Prolog, SICStus Prolog is the best I >know of. Sepia is not yet well known, but it is an alternative that should be also considered. It has all the features mentioned with SICStus, plus some extras, e.g. the graphic interface for X and SunView, synchronous and asynchronous event handling, constructive negation, declarative corouting etc. I can give more details to everyone who is interested. There is a nominal fee of ~ $200 for academic sites. --Micha Meier -- USA micha%ecrc.de@pyramid.com MAIL Micha Meier ECRC, Arabellastr. 17 EUROPE micha@ecrc.de 8000 Munich 81 West Germany
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1745@ecrc.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!van-bc!ubc-cs!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!wuarchive!emory!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!fauern!tumuc!guug!ecrc!michaReferences:
<GARYM.90Oct14143102@cognos.uucp@uunet.uu.net> <40304@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <4010@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!van-bc!ubc-cs!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!wuarchive!emory!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!fauern!tumuc!guug!ecrc!micha From: micha@ecrc.de (Micha Meier) Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog Subject: Re: SICStus prolog vs. SBprolog? Message-ID: <1745@ecrc.de> Date: 20 Oct 90 21:32:20 GMT References: <GARYM.90Oct14143102@cognos.uucp@uunet.uu.net> <40304@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <4010@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> Sender: news@ecrc.de Reply-To: micha@ecrc.de (Micha Meier) Organization: ECRC Lines: 17