Re: Standards question: behavior of arg/3

Article View: comp.lang.prolog

Article #1323

#1323

From: Micha Meier
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 1990 15:12

19 lines
1087 bytes

In article <3992@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> ok@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au (Richard A. O'Keefe) writes:
>> Is arg(-3,Term,Arg) ok?
>
>Except for the omitted spaces (it should be arg(-3, Term, Arg)),
>of course it is.

This actually reminds me - did Quintus change their way of printing Prolog
terms in the new release, or is everything still printed without spaces?
What is the position of ISO in this matter? I find it should be
standardised. It makes comparison of the output from two Prolog systems
easier.

--Micha
--
E-MAIL  micha@ecrc.de            	MAIL	Micha Meier
						ECRC, Arabellastr. 17
                     				8000 Munich 81
						Germany

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1808@ecrc.de>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!unido!fauern!tumuc!guug!ecrc!micha

References: <9888@bunny.GTE.COM> <3992@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!unido!fauern!tumuc!guug!ecrc!micha
From: micha@ecrc.de (Micha Meier)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Re: Standards question: behavior of arg/3
Keywords: ANSI, standard
Message-ID: <1808@ecrc.de>
Date: 25 Oct 90 15:12:05 GMT
References: <9888@bunny.GTE.COM> <3992@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au>
Sender: news@ecrc.de
Reply-To: micha@ecrc.de (Micha Meier)
Organization: ECRC
Lines: 19

Reply to Parent Message