Article View: comp.lang.prolog
Article #1357Re: Turbo Prolog 2.0 tip
From: ada612
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 1990 00:02
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 1990 00:02
23 lines
1033 bytes
1033 bytes
>After all, there is
>no speed advantage from Turbo Prolog. Developing code is much easier under
>say ALS Prolog, and the code runs fast...
How does ALS prolog stack up against PDC/Turbo w.r.t.
a) compactness of compiled code
b) efficiency of storage of structures (where `reference' variables
are being used all over the place)
c) pleasant-to-use IO, including windows, etc.
d) ability to store terms in EMS, on hard disks, etc.
e) price
These questions are apropos of shoehorning LFG systems for use by linguistics
students into the confines of PCs without blowing personal or departmental
budgets.
Avery Andrews (ada612@csc.anu.oz.au)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Nov1.100235.3213@csc.anu.oz.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!bu.edu!rpi!batcomputer!munnari.oz.au!csc.anu.oz.au!ada612Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!bu.edu!rpi!batcomputer!munnari.oz.au!csc.anu.oz.au!ada612 From: ada612@csc.anu.oz.au Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog Subject: Re: Turbo Prolog 2.0 tip Message-ID: <1990Nov1.100235.3213@csc.anu.oz.au> Date: 1 Nov 90 00:02:33 GMT Organization: Computer Services, Australian National University Lines: 23