Re: prolog compiler

Article View: comp.lang.prolog

Article #1557

#1557

From: Claude Duguay
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 20:06

11 lines
1035 bytes

Randy.Baer@f310.n3603.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Randy Baer) writes:

>   I have Turbo Prolog, but have been told it is a kids toy.  Truth?

Surely you don't judge a piece of software on the basis of someone else's
opinion... The only legitimate objection people have to Turbo Prolog is its
non-standard approach. In its own domain (as a typed compiler) it excels
and its inability to run standard Prolog code is about to become a non-
issue.

Claude Duguay              cduguay@lcraft.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca

Technical Details

Message-ID: <qPDqTB1w165w@lcraft.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!yale!gumby!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca!ersys!lcraft!cduguay

References: <517.2AF42BB1@mechanic.Fidonet.org>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!yale!gumby!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca!ersys!lcraft!cduguay
From: cduguay@lcraft.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Claude Duguay)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Re: prolog compiler
Message-ID: <qPDqTB1w165w@lcraft.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 92 13:06:37 MST
References: <517.2AF42BB1@mechanic.Fidonet.org>
Organization: LogiCraft Corp, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message