🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <ku3iimINNgs3@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> jyl@burgess.Eng.Sun.COM (Jacob Levy) writes:
>Look, I know - naive reverse is not a good benchmark - please
>don't flame me. Still, I am interested in seeing numbers on the
>speed of this program on various Prolog implementations. Also
>interesting would be some numbers for implementations of
>concurrent languages such as FGHC, Parlog, Strand, PCN, FCP,
>Janus, etc.


This is an interesting idea. I'd like to make the suggestion that people
do their testing with Peter Van Roy's set of benchmarks. He very kindly
sent them to me, and maybe he'd consider giving them to others. They
would give a better idea of the capabilities of some of the systems.

I should say that I haven't asked Peter whether he's agreeable - I hope
he doesn't mind me making the suggestion...

Mike
brady@cs.tcd.ie
-- 
Michael Brady                         brady@cs.tcd.ie
Department of Computer Science
University of Dublin, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland