Article View: comp.lang.prolog
Article #1624Re: Uncompiled prolog (History of Prolog)
From: Peter Ludemann
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 16:56
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 16:56
16 lines
1436 bytes
1436 bytes
In article <15039@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au>, ok@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au (Richard A. O'Keefe) writes: > There were two other Prolog > implementations that have some claim to "originality" and still have some > influence: Waterloo Prolog started out as someone's Masters project; it > was developed from published descriptions of the _ideas_ of Prolog, but I > heard that the author had no access to the sources of any Prolog. Aspects > of that design live on in IBM Prolog. That "someone" was Grant Roberts; probably his Masters thesis is still available from the University of Waterloo (I read the thesis some years ago; it appeared to give a fast implementation using very different techniques from those used at Edinburgh). It's a pity that Grant Robert's work has languished in obscurity because he picked the wrong target hardware. - peter ludemann ludemann@quintus.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct14.165628.1944@quintus.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!infonode!ingr!capalo!quintus!quintus!ludemannReferences:
<1992Oct7.172542.21894@news.columbia.edu> <15039@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!infonode!ingr!capalo!quintus!quintus!ludemann From: ludemann@quintus.com (Peter Ludemann) Subject: Re: Uncompiled prolog (History of Prolog) Message-ID: <1992Oct14.165628.1944@quintus.com> Sender: news@quintus.com (USENET news account) Nntp-Posting-Host: ebisu Organization: Quintus Corporation, Palo Alto, CA References: <1992Oct7.172542.21894@news.columbia.edu> <15039@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 16:56:28 GMT Lines: 17