Known Bugs in Quintus Prolog version 3.0/3.1?

Article View: comp.lang.prolog

Article #1923

#1923

From: John Dowding
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1991 18:07

10 lines
736 bytes

I am just starting a major rewrite of a large Prolog program to port
to the newest version of Quintus Prolog 3.0/3.1.  I would appreciate
knowing about bugs that other users have found with this new product.

Yes, I am also asking Quintus.

Thanks in advance,
John Dowding
dowding@ai.sri.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <DOWDING.91Mar18100746@sunset.ai.sri.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!hsdndev!husc6!unix!unix.sri.com!dowding

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!hsdndev!husc6!unix!unix.sri.com!dowding
From: dowding@ai.sri.com (John Dowding)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Known Bugs in Quintus Prolog version 3.0/3.1?
Message-ID: <DOWDING.91Mar18100746@sunset.ai.sri.com>
Date: 18 Mar 91 18:07:46 GMT
Sender: news@unix.SRI.COM
Distribution: comp
Organization: SRI International, Menlo Park, CA
Lines: 10