🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.prolog
Article #2251

Re: Logic programming languages other than Prolog ?

#2251
From: Richard A. O'Keefe
Date: Sat, 25 May 1991 07:11
16 lines
1239 bytes
In article <jfl.675148139@mullauna>, jfl@mullauna.cs.mu.OZ.AU (John Lenarcic) writes:
> I understand that Prolog is only an approximation of the
> lofty aims of logic programming. However, judging from most
> of the Prolog textbooks on the market, one would think that
> Prolog "is" Logic Programming. How many competitors does Prolog have ?

May I put in a plug for Trilogy?  The address I have for them is
	Complete Logic Systems, Inc.,
	741 Blueridge Ave,
	North Vancouver, B.C.,
	Canada, V7R 2J5.
Paul Voda has published several papers about Trilogy in logic programming
conferences.  It was even reviewed in Byte several years ago.
-- 
I rejoiced that at least So-and-So could spell "hierarchical",
but the _real_ explanation was that he couldn't spell "heir".	-me
Technical Details
Message-ID: <5955@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!munnari.oz.au!goanna!ok
References: <jfl.675148139@mullauna>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!munnari.oz.au!goanna!ok
From: ok@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au (Richard A. O'Keefe)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Re: Logic programming languages other than Prolog ?
Keywords: Logic programming, Prolog
Message-ID: <5955@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au>
Date: 25 May 91 07:11:01 GMT
References: <jfl.675148139@mullauna>
Organization: Comp Sci, RMIT, Melbourne, Australia
Lines: 16