Article View: comp.lang.prolog
Article #2453Grotesque
From: Olivier Ridoux
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 09:04
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 09:04
24 lines
1009 bytes
1009 bytes
> I realised a while back that you can use DCGs for many programs that > don't look like parsing. My favorite (and most grotesque) is flatten: > > flatten(List, FlattenedList):- > phrase(flatten(List), FlattenedList). > > flatten([]) --> []. > > flatten([Head|Rest]) --> > flatten(Head), > flatten(Rest). > > flatten(List) --> > [List]. I cannot see what is so *grotesque* in trying to give a condensed expression of the regularities a computation contains. I suppose you disapprove of using DCG for something which seems the opposite of syntactic analysis. However, especially in Prolog, one should be used with non-directional thinking. Olivier Ridoux
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan8.090450.8875@irisa.fr>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!julienas!irisa!ridouxShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!julienas!irisa!ridoux From: ridoux@irisa.fr (Olivier Ridoux) Subject: Grotesque Message-ID: <1993Jan8.090450.8875@irisa.fr> Sender: news@irisa.fr Organization: IRISA, Rennes (Fr) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 93 09:04:50 GMT Lines: 25