Re: Sterling and Shapiro

Article View: comp.lang.prolog

Article #2494

#2494

From: Kim P. Collins
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1986 04:30

5 lines
694 bytes

I think that Sterling and Shapiro is well written.  I recommend it.
-- 
CSNET: kpc@duke        
UUCP:  {ihnp4!decvax}!duke!kpc
ARPA:  kpc%duke@csnet-relay

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8873@duke.duke.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!cmcl2!yale!husc6!panda!genrad!decvax!mcnc!duke!kpc

References: <8486UH2@PSUVM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!cmcl2!yale!husc6!panda!genrad!decvax!mcnc!duke!kpc
From: kpc@duke.UUCP (Kim P. Collins)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Re: Sterling and Shapiro
Message-ID: <8873@duke.duke.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 20-Nov-86 23:30:31 EST
Article-I.D.: duke.8873
Posted: Thu Nov 20 23:30:31 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 21-Nov-86 20:33:30 EST
References: <8486UH2@PSUVM>
Reply-To: kpc@duke.UUCP (Kim P. Collins)
Organization: Duke University, Durham NC
Lines: 5

Reply to Parent Message