Article View: comp.lang.prolog
Article #2562Re: How do you like Turbo-Prolog?
From: Mike Newton
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1987 22:27
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1987 22:27
9 lines
1065 bytes
1065 bytes
>>> Also, and most seriously (thanks to Fernando Pereira) there are two more >>> *MAJOR* problems: the logical variable doesn't really >>> exist: it is a runtime error to do variable-to-variable unifications By "thanks to Fernando Pereira" I meant "thanks to him for pointing this out to me". I believe he was as upset as I was about the changes. - mike newton
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1998@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ll-xn!cit-vax!newtonReferences:
<426@thumper.UUCP> <7000002@iaoobelix.UUCP> <1973@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> <1974@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> <316@its63b.ed.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ll-xn!cit-vax!newton From: newton@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu (Mike Newton) Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog Subject: Re: How do you like Turbo-Prolog? Message-ID: <1998@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> Date: Tue, 10-Mar-87 17:27:23 EST Article-I.D.: cit-vax.1998 Posted: Tue Mar 10 17:27:23 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 11-Mar-87 04:06:47 EST References: <426@thumper.UUCP> <7000002@iaoobelix.UUCP> <1973@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> <1974@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> <316@its63b.ed.ac.uk> Reply-To: newton@cit-vax.UUCP (Mike Newton) Organization: California Institute of Technology Lines: 8 Keywords: Edinburgh Syntax, Prolog, Turbo