Anyone like MicroProlog Professional?

Article View: comp.lang.prolog

Article #2602

#2602

From: R. Mark Chilenskas
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1987 19:15

16 lines
1368 bytes

Comments on Arity prolog have been quite favorable.  I have been growing 
out of my old 128k max MicroProlog.  In many ways i like the metaprogramming
facilities better (too much of a lisp hacker i guess - =.. just never was
something i could remember), and would prefer not throwing away some of
my existing utilities.  So i could upgrage to MicroProlog Professional,
which uses the normal "full DOS ram" and has a compiler, or i could go
all the way to Arity (and finally try to get comfortable with Edinburgh
syntax).

Can anyone compare the two?  Anyone have favorable things to say about
LPA's product?

Thank ye,
						R Mark Chilenskas
						decvax!genrad!panda!rmc

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3863@teddy.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!cmcl2!yale!husc6!panda!teddy!rmc

References: <473@thumper.UUCP> <473@iscuva.UUCP> <2578@sunybcs.UUCP> <382@uhccux.UUCP> <2610@sunybcs.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!cmcl2!yale!husc6!panda!teddy!rmc
From: rmc@teddy.UUCP (R. Mark Chilenskas)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Anyone like MicroProlog Professional?
Message-ID: <3863@teddy.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 18-Mar-87 14:15:39 EST
Article-I.D.: teddy.3863
Posted: Wed Mar 18 14:15:39 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 20-Mar-87 01:23:14 EST
References: <473@thumper.UUCP> <473@iscuva.UUCP> <2578@sunybcs.UUCP> <382@uhccux.UUCP> <2610@sunybcs.UUCP>
Reply-To: rmc@teddy.UUCP (R. Mark Chilenskas)
Distribution: na
Organization: GenRad, Inc., Concord, Mass.
Lines: 16
Keywords: prolog Arity Turbo MicroProlog

Reply to Parent Message