query: structuring sharing vs non-sharing

Article View: comp.lang.prolog

Article #2695

#2695

From: Dik Lun Lee
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1987 17:32

21 lines
1175 bytes

I remember there was some discussion a long while ago on the pros and cons of
struncturing sharing vs non-sharing in Prolog and the benefits
of tail recursion optimization. If you have collected those postings,
I would be happy to receive a copy.

Dik Lee
Dept. Computer & Information Science, The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio 43210-1277

dlee@ohio-state.arpa
dlee@ohio-state.csnet
..!cbosgd!osu-eddie!dlee Usenet
..!cbatt!osu-eddie!dlee Usenet
-- 
Dept. Computer & Information Science, The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio 43210-1277

dlee@ohio-state.arpa
dlee@ohio-state.csnet
..!cbosgd!osu-eddie!dlee Usenet
..!cbatt!osu-eddie!dlee Usenet

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3720@osu-eddie.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!clyde!cbosgd!osu-eddie!dlee

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!clyde!cbosgd!osu-eddie!dlee
From: dlee@osu-eddie.UUCP (Dik Lun Lee)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: query: structuring sharing vs non-sharing
Message-ID: <3720@osu-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 25-Jun-87 13:32:05 EDT
Article-I.D.: osu-eddi.3720
Posted: Thu Jun 25 13:32:05 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 27-Jun-87 04:03:09 EDT
Organization: Ohio State Univ, Computer Science Department
Lines: 21