MU-Prolog

Article View: comp.lang.prolog

Article #2760

#2760

From: maner
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1987 17:07

15 lines
1122 bytes

Could anyone compare MU-Prolog with Quintus (or CProlog) for me?  I don't
need a diff on the respective feature lists.  What I need is something
like "I've used X and Y and I prefer ___ because ___."  Hidden motive:
We could stretch our budget to buy Quintus, but if MU-Prolog (or CProlog)
will be adequate for research and instruction, we could spend the dollars
elsewhere.

Walt


-- 
CSNet   : maner@research1.bgsu.edu               | CS Dept    419/372-2337
UUCP    : {cbatt,cbosgd}!osu-cis!bgsuvax!maner   | BGSU
Generic : maner%research1.bgsu.edu@relay.cs.net  | Bowling Green, OH 43403
Opinion : If you are married, you deserve a MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER weekend!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1285@bgsuvax.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!osu-cis!bgsuvax!maner

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!osu-cis!bgsuvax!maner
From: maner@bgsuvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: MU-Prolog
Message-ID: <1285@bgsuvax.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 11-Sep-87 13:07:50 EDT
Article-I.D.: bgsuvax.1285
Posted: Fri Sep 11 13:07:50 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 16-Sep-87 04:19:05 EDT
Organization: Bowling Green State University B.G., Oh.
Lines: 15