Article View: comp.lang.prolog
Article #2799Re: Prolog Compilers for the PC
From: bondc
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1987 14:47
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1987 14:47
12 lines
1301 bytes
1301 bytes
I would not recommend TurboProlog (Borland). I generally like Borland's software, but Turbo is not Prolog. It is irritatingly Pascal-esque, in that all prediciates, and their valences (which must remain constant throughout the program) must be declared, all variable types ditto, et cetera. It's fine if you've never worked with standard, Edinburgh Prolog, but a real drag if you have. Try MicroProlog; I've never played with it, but Pereira (@Stanford) likes it, so that's some recommendation. Further suggestions, if they arise, will be posted. By the way, just exactly what are the differences between Edinburgh (which I learned) and Quintus? Mange tak.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<23800001@silver>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!iuvax!silver!bondcReferences:
<228@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!iuvax!silver!bondc From: bondc@silver.bacs.indiana.edu Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog Subject: Re: Prolog Compilers for the PC Message-ID: <23800001@silver> Date: Tue, 6-Oct-87 10:47:00 EDT Article-I.D.: silver.23800001 Posted: Tue Oct 6 10:47:00 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 9-Oct-87 06:10:20 EDT References: <228@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU> Organization: Indiana University BACS, Bloomington Lines: 12 Nf-ID: #R:orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU:-22800:silver:23800001:000:663 Nf-From: silver.bacs.indiana.edu!bondc Oct 6 09:47:00 1987