Article View: comp.lang.prolog
Article #2989Re: ProWindows
From: Yorick Phoenix
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1988 10:28
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1988 10:28
9 lines
866 bytes
866 bytes
In article <901@kbsc.UUCP> yorick@kbsc.UUCP (Yorick Phoenix) writes: >I have been using PCE 1.x, 2.x and soon will be using 3.x. ProWindows from >what I can make out is based around PCE 1.x so what I say may not match what >you see. Well, silly me, it is infact based on PCE 2.0. So I can relate to it quite well as I'm using PCE 2.2 at the moment. Yorick
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<723@SouthBank.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-unix!quintus!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!mcvax!ukc!stc!idec!kbsc!SouthBank!yorickReferences:
<335@expya.UUCP> <901@kbsc.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-unix!quintus!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!mcvax!ukc!stc!idec!kbsc!SouthBank!yorick From: yorick@SouthBank.UUCP (Yorick Phoenix) Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog Subject: Re: ProWindows Message-ID: <723@SouthBank.UUCP> Date: 10 Feb 88 10:28:50 GMT References: <335@expya.UUCP> <901@kbsc.UUCP> Reply-To: yorick@kbsc.uucp (Yorick Phoenix) Followup-To: <901@kbsc.UUCP> Organization: The Knowledge-Based Systems Centre, London, UK Lines: 7