Re: Escalation

Article View: comp.lang.prolog

Article #3000

#3000

From: Ian Dickinson
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1988 15:53

17 lines
975 bytes

> / comp.lang.prolog / fritz@hpfclp.HP.COM (Gary Fritz) / writes:
> My opinion:
>   ... 5 points in support of Richard O'Keefe's contributions to 
>       comp.lang.prolog ...
> 
> [RAO'K] has contributed to my knowledge and understanding of
> Prolog, and I hope he is permitted to continue without undue restrictions.

I completely agree.

Ian Dickinson,
HP Labs,
Bristol.

[PS I have a sneaking suspicion that verbatim text of Gary's reply may have
gone out again under my name.  Apologies if that is so, and a pox on the 
camel herd of the person that wrote this news interface :-)  IJD].

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1600004@otter.hple.hp.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!hplabs!otter!ijd

References: <639@cresswell.quintus.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!hplabs!otter!ijd
From: ijd@otter.hple.hp.com (Ian Dickinson)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Re: Escalation
Message-ID: <1600004@otter.hple.hp.com>
Date: 17 Feb 88 15:53:19 GMT
References: <639@cresswell.quintus.UUCP>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Bristol, UK.
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message