🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <hpfclp.6960002> fritz@hpfclp.UUCP writes:
>My opinion:
>
>  1. RAO'K has a communication style which is sometimes a bit inflammatory.
>  2. He also has some extremely valid things to say about programming in 
>     Prolog.
>  3. He frequently manages to convey his pearls in extremely erudite,
>     eloquent prose which is a pleasure to read.
>  4. As far as I can tell, he is amazingly sincere about his crusade, and
>     astonishingly open-minded to the possibility that he may be wrong.
>     His calls for an objectively better way of programming are laudable.
>  5. I would hate to see his contributions curtailed because of some
>     ruffled feathers and apprehensive superiors.
>
>{Richard, Mr., Dr.} O'Keefe (what does one call you when not being freezingly
>polite, anyway? :-) has contributed to my knowledge and understanding of
>Prolog, and I hope he is permitted to continue without undue restrictions.
>
>Gary Fritz



I fully support Gary Fritz.

I have immensely profited from O'Keefe's contributions and would miss them.
He - and Lagache - are doing the Prolog community a great service.              

   --- nef